MacroFine Photography
  • Home
  • Artist
    • Shows and Exhibitions
  • Behind the Scenes
  • Contact
  • Room Views
  • Gallery
  • Shop
  • Home
  • Artist
    • Shows and Exhibitions
  • Behind the Scenes
  • Contact
  • Room Views
  • Gallery
  • Shop
Search

Five Ways To Raise Your Photo I.Q. (interest quotient)

11/10/2015

 
Photograph of a single rain drop on a pink roseSingle Tear
Chris Fedderson — MacroFine Musings
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 
Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop.
            — Ansel Adams
 
Twelve?!  One a Month?!  Heck, I can take 500 in one day!  What’s wrong with that guy?!
 
Not a dang thing.  Mr. Adams just knew how to look critically and unemotionally at his work so he could cull his collected production down to just his very best “keepers”.

Have you ever seen one of his images and said, “eh…”?  Neither have I.
 
Why should we care about culling and deleting any of our shots, anyway?  Each one has some value and we might want to use it… sometime… right?  Yes.  But… does its value warrant storing it?  Does it illustrate a lesson, or technique, or photographic result which we will need to refer to again?  Is it the only remaining photo of Aunt Millie, dearly departed?  Well then, by all means keep these — but cull the rest.  What you are achieving by doing this culling is avoiding amassing tens of terabytes of “also-rans” among which you will then lose your keepers, never to be able to find them again.
 
I have no idea what criteria Mr. Adams used, nor do I know what criteria you might use in assessing your shots.  But I will share with you my five points and you may adopt them, alter them to make them fit your needs, or simply continue to amass those terabytes. . .
 
1. BEST FOCUS
Mr. Adams also said, “There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept.”  The corollary is also true: “There is nothing worse than a fuzzy image of a sharp concept”.  I don’t mean necessarily edge-to-edge or foreground-to-background all in focus, but is the essential focal point crisp? This may be only a single drop of water, but if that drop tells your whole story it MUST be in focus; and the image may well benefit from the rest being somewhat out of focus.  This focus thing is the deal breaker.  Without it, the shot is junk.


Photograph of red Japanese Maple leavesAutumn Effect
2. COMPOSITION
Did I chop off the top of Aunt Millie’s bouffant?  Is Uncle Marvin’s left shoulder left out?  Did I dead-center the butterfly?  Or possibly worse, is it flying OUT of the frame?  Do I have elements to direct the viewer’s eye?  Composition will set the mood and give an indication of the story within your image.  Be sure it says what you intend it to.


Photograph of white Water LilyLily Grace

3. LIGHTING

Is that beautiful flower — the whole point to the image — lost in a wash of cluttered background? Is your single drop of water in a deep shadow while the rest of the flower is brightly lit? Does your snow look really blue, or worse, really yellow?  Is everything behind Aunt Millie so bright it washes out into a blurred glow, leaving her in the dark? Or is the sun so bright in her eyes that she looks like one of those squinted-up apple dolls?


Close-Up photograph of a steel gray HibiscusSteel Hibiscus
4. COLOR
I shoot color, but this rule applies just as well to B+W.  What I’m looking for here is more than just the presence of color.  I want great color contrast, color juxtaposition, color coordination, color framing elements within the image, color balance, color depth — or softness …


Photograph of dried maple leaf caught in a Japanese Hardy Orange thicketLife in the City
5. UNUSUAL ELEMENTS or MESSAGE
. . . YOUR HOOK

For me, the most important criteria is: what is the reason for this image?  Does it carry a special or unusual meaning or message?  Is it particularly poignant?  It may be technically perfect.  Stunningly focused and composed.  But if it’s a snapshot of nothing… cull it!  After all, you don’t want to “eh…” people, you want to “WOW!” people.


I hate culling.  It’s like deciding which of your kids you like best.  And then telling them. But, unlike with kids, it must be done, if for no other reason than it forces you to detach, and to look critically at your work and techniques to assess the good, the bad, and the truly ugly.  Do it — you’ll learn a lot!  Have Fun!
 
Thank You for visiting,
 
— Chris
 
P.s.      In future posts, I will be elaborating on each of these criteria.  In the meantime, create some of your own, comment on mine, and we’ll compare notes.


Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    Art In Your Home
    Art Shows
    Color
    Define Macro
    Garden
    Introduction
    Other Fun Stuff
    Photo Equipment
    Photography
    Photo Technique
    The Arts

    RSS Feed

    Picture

    About Chris

    I am a Virginia-based photographer and gather my images while hiking in parks and natural areas here at home and in the locations I travel to.  I also love to visit arboretums and botanic gardens to find unusual and exotic subjects.

    With my photography, I explore intricate textures, repeating patterns, visual rhythms, and the emotion inherent in the infinite occurrences of Nature’s minutia. I find these are the fascinating, fundamental elements that integrate into our cohesive, synergistic — and essential — ecosystem.

    It is my hope and my goal that my viewers will gain not only an immediate connection with my images, but that this relationship will be forever evolving within their hearts as they bring a never-ending flow of life experiences to every viewing.



    Archives

    March 2017
    February 2017
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015

  • Home
  • Artist
    • Shows and Exhibitions
  • Behind the Scenes
  • Contact
  • Room Views
  • Gallery
  • Shop